Hi Grant > -----Original Message----- > From: arm.ebbr-discuss-boun...@arm.com <arm.ebbr-discuss- > boun...@arm.com> On Behalf Of Grant Likely > Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 7:24 PM > To: boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-disc...@arm.com > Cc: n...@arm.com > Subject: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] [PATCH 1/7] Remove UEFI Loaded Image section > > The UEFI spec already specifies the image format. No need to specify in EBBR. > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@arm.com> > --- > source/chapter2-uefi.rst | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/source/chapter2-uefi.rst b/source/chapter2-uefi.rst index > 177a81c..f89ac04 100644 > --- a/source/chapter2-uefi.rst > +++ b/source/chapter2-uefi.rst > @@ -73,12 +73,6 @@ that virtual addresses must equal physical addresses. > > The default RAM allocated attribute must be EFI_MEMORY_WB. > > -UEFI Loaded Images > ------------------- > - > -UEFI loaded images for AArch64 must be in 64-bit PE/COFF format and must - > contain only A64 code. > - > Configuration Tables > --------------------
Speaking about, u-boot image which is not PE/COFF format. IMHO, document should provide this clarity. However, by loaded image we are referring to efi driver/application which may run from u-boot shell, should have PE/COFF format or I missed something on this section > -- > 2.13.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list > arm.ebbr-disc...@arm.com _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
