On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:40:20PM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote: > Define the meanings of "MUST" and similar language for clarity. > > Fixes: #46 > Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <[email protected]>
Looks like Grant and I both thought "let's just fix this one before the meeting"! You can ignore this (unless you want to copy the specific sphinx syntax for citing RFCs). Daniel. > --- > source/chapter1-about.rst | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/source/chapter1-about.rst b/source/chapter1-about.rst > index 3744d8a14086..3b5339a9c202 100644 > --- a/source/chapter1-about.rst > +++ b/source/chapter1-about.rst > @@ -171,6 +171,10 @@ UEFI ยง 6.1 - Reference to the UEFI specification [UEFI]_ > section 6.1 > Terms and abbreviations > ======================= > > +The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", > +SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this > +document are to be interpreted as described in :rfc:`2119`. > + > This document uses the following terms and abbreviations. > > .. glossary:: > -- > 2.25.4 > _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
