On 24/01/13 09:13, Ivan Kohler wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 04:26:14PM +0000, Simon Waters wrote:
Do any of the existing modules do anything along these lines already?
https://metacpan.org/requires/distribution/XML-Simple lists PaymenTech,
IPPay and Litle also using XML::Simple.
Okay so not a new sort of dependency, and not crazy bad. Wasn't sure
with HTTPS if I should be testing the https_post return. I will feed it
more nonsense in testing which will reveal any failings in error handling.
All the modules seem to split protocol, server, path for the
connection. Is that an SSLeay thing, as the LWP::UserAgent approach
can be just strings. Do BOP authors care? [...]
Should I be using Business::OnlinePayments::HTTPS
I would call it a "nice to have", but probably the least important thing
in notes_for_module_writers_v3. Problems with one or other of the SSL
modules are less common than they used to be.
Well I'm using it.
I'd like to ask Ivan from 7 years ago why he thought it should be at the
top with exclamation marks.
Maybe because the other Perl SSL modules didn't verify the certificates
correctly. I'll assume you knew what you were doing back then ;)
AuthorizeNet was the first module and in the past was probably the
canonical source of standard keys and value formatting. The code itself
has grown too much to recommend as a starting point for new modules.
Okay - useful to know.
"MM/YY". I have now documented this in the base B:OP documentation and
corrected the example.
Sorted.
_______________________________________________
bop-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeside.biz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bop-devel
