At 17:20 -0500 2001.01.03, John Porter wrote:
>Elaine -HFB- Ashton wrote:
>> John Porter [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth:
>> *>Maybe it would if it weren't such a dog.
>>
>> Now John, I think you could say something more meaningful than that.
>>
>> MJD has done a lot to get good articles on perl.com, but, indeed, some
>> parts do seem to have lost their freshness ...
>
>Yes; but I'm not talking about the freshness, mainly.
>I'm talking about the fact that the site is a dog.
>As in, dog slow. The page layout "design" is bletcherous,
>but it wouldn't bother me so much if it would load in a snappy
>manner. That box has always been slow. www.perl.com should
>be transplanted to new hardware. Or maybe it's the pipe (or
>should I say pipecleaner?) it's hanging from; I can't tell.
>It's one or the other.
>
>I hope that's meaningfully more meaningful. :-)
It seems fast enough to me. And I think it has the best original perl
content online (not including TPJ :).
--
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
