At 08:08 PM 9/9/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > But how about just ":"? Anyone have any thoughts or know if Larry and the
> > crew have considered it?
> >
> > -matthew-
>actually i heard that it's believed that ":" can beused for just about
>anything and for that reason they stay way form it. it has been considered
>though. i don't really like that justification, and i don't know if it'
>the only one.
"Larry's rule of RFCs--everyone wants the colon". If you read through the
RFC list from last fall, you'll find about half of them wanted the colon
for one thing or another.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin "->&q... Matthew Brooks
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Dan Sugalski
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Ron Newman
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Matthew Brooks
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Dan Sugalski
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Matthew Brooks
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Kenneth Graves
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Jerrad Pierce
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Kenneth Graves
- Re: [Boston.pm] Breaking "." to ruin &quo... Uri Guttman
