> I'm using Test::More, but I'm not attached. That legacy API has been reimplemented on Test2 internals, so a lot of folks are moving to Test2::* API. But there's nothing /wrong/ with Test::More.
On 07/03/2022 19:03, em...@greglondon.com wrote: > > Another issue I'm running into is that I'm doing a lot of negative > testing. > > I'm testing a module I wrote and making sure it errors out when given > > bad data. > Good! On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:16 PM David Cantrell <da...@cantrell.org.uk> wrote: > The best tool for this is Capture::Tiny. > I won't disagree with David. IDK if my team's testing gury will be on the Boston.PM virtual meeting Tuesday but you can bring questions about testing. -- Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list Boston-pm@pm.org https://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
