Hi! I don’t think there’s _one_ gold standard yet? I also admit to not being the most on top of this, but I think that in Perl, your choices are:
- the new (“Corinna”) object system, if you can require a recent version of Perl and if the (currently limited) set of abilities suffices - Moo if you want a fairly light-weight version of Moose — it can’t quite do everything, but it covers the basic cases, and can easily be upgraded to Moose - Moose if you want everything and the kitchen sink Of course, you can always use the existing OO system. There’s a ton of modules on CPAN for other object systems. I think that Mojolicious has a built-in OO system that might be usable? I remember some others showing up in Advent calendars in the past… Ricky > On Nov 24, 2024, at 8:02 PM, [email protected] wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > Had an idea for some non-work related perl code that would almost certainly > have to be object oriented/class based. > > I'd also like it to maybe be something to make open source for others to use. > So, i would be looking for something that is kinda "core", considered the > "gold standard" for doing oo perl, emphasis on "standard". > > I confess, i have fallen out of touch with whatever is the latest and > greatest for doing OO in perl. Last time I looked, it was moose. But now Raku > is out, and i havent been following it at all. I just havent had the time to > code for fun like i used to. And while i use a LOT of perl at work, its > always glue scripts tying unix commands together and parsing log files and > such. Lots of regexes, zero classes. > > I have written a lot of oo perl, but it was all blessed hash refs stuff, and > thats just terrible. > > Anyway, if someone could point me to whatever is the latest greatest, gold > standard method for OO perl, i would appreciate it. > > And if the answer is "use raku", then i may need a primer on raku, cause > every time ive looked at raku, i get confused and go back to perl. Or maybe i > need to stick with the best standard, but specifically for perl. > > Any pointers would be appreciated > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > Boston-pm mailing list > [email protected] > https://secure-web.cisco.com/1HKvo1kM36VA2S8K8UKbMmxiENOekzDpLTkj6cG-jB7wENMh407vObRmKccbM2xfzuFkai0n4iQKwASMmu1uq_2bWhtx-mKcuxaePqf03-uypahU8TvT6xLugZX0dKj-KIin2NGz3IHWxNufmuVGH9mZV7X6xSxa7i1GxTf8iX75QaTi6pBP9D-fGxeDWhcJf_puFldxTH9GyurI8beuhe27b7dPBtAaVb7mDuMmT4S9RbB8J2EzZ9PizN4JIuFXRQuczbXrMgVl3iC4StrxB-NDAPYydh7_Bighv-S1CQZnwms7CFfhysmw9i4DPqimG/https%3A%2F%2Fmail.pm.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fboston-pm > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline <https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> . Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. _______________________________________________ Boston-pm mailing list [email protected] https://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm
