Here is what Kay is referring to in case you haven't seen it....

CMS Quietly Releases Controversial Medicaid Eligibility Guidelines
By John Reichard, CQ HealthBeat Editor
Opting to release them at a time of the week that traditionally means they get 
little attention from the press, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services 
announced new guidelines late Friday that states must follow as of July 1 to 
document eligibility for the Medicaid program. The controversial requirements 
relate to documenting citizenship and pertain not only to new enrollees, but 
also to existing enrollees who continue on in Medicaid for any substantial 
length of time after July 1. 
The guidelines allow only “rarely” the use of sworn affidavits attesting to 
citizenship. They emphasize the use of passports and birth certificates to 
establish eligibility —forms of documentation that advocacy groups for the poor 
say make it difficult for a significant number of qualified applicants to 
establish citizenship and stay on or enroll in Medicaid.
Advocates favor more liberal use of affidavits, saying that research shows 
relatively few undeserving people make it onto the Medicaid rolls under the 
affidavit system. But with illegal immigration swelling, House Republicans 
applied pressure on CMS to rely almost exclusively on other procedures to 
assure eligibility.
The procedures allow for various other types of paperwork other than passports 
and birth certificates. They include certificates of naturalization, final 
adoption decrees, a U.S. citizen ID card, an extract of a hospital birth 
record, and medical or nursing home admission records showing a place of birth, 
among others.
“Written affidavits may be used only in rare circumstances when the state is 
unable to secure evidence of citizenship from another listing,” CMS said. “The 
affidavits must be supplied by at least two individuals, one of whom is not 
related to the applicant or recipient. Each must attest to having personal 
knowledge of the event(s) establishing the applicant’s or recipient’s claim of 
citizenship.” 
In addition, “those making affidavits must be able to prove their own 
citizenship and identity for the affidavit to be accepted. Those making 
affidavits will be subject to prosecution for perjury.” 
CMS added that “a second affidavit from the applicant ... or other 
knowledgeable individual explaining why documentary evidence does not exist or 
cannot be readily obtained must also be requested."



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon Jun 12 15:12:30 2006
Subject: RE: Colo. Ballot Can't Have Immigrant Measure

I just clarified with our state association that the ballot issue is dead for 
this year since the deadline to correct the language has come and gone.
 
We can breathe easy I guess for a bit.
 
Hmmmmmmm but the Medicaid ID issue hits us on July 1st - just when you think 
you have some sense of control!
 
kay
 
 
Kay Ramachandran 
CEO/President 
People's Clinic 
3303 N. Broadway 
Boulder, CO 80304 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
(720) 565 - 4115 
 

        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
Bohannan, Robin
        Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 1:28 PM
        To: Boulder County HSA (E-mail)
        Subject: FW: Colo. Ballot Can't Have Immigrant Measure
        
        
        Forgive me if you've already heard the great news!
         
         

        Colo. Ballot Can't Have Immigrant Measure

         

        By JON SARCHE

        The Associated Press

        Monday, June 12, 2006; 11:00 AM

         

        DENVER -- The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Monday that a proposal to 
deny most state services to illegal immigrants cannot appear on the November 
ballot.

         

        The proposed constitutional amendment, promoted by Defend Colorado Now, 
violates a state constitutional requirement that initiatives deal with only one 
subject, the court said in an unanimous opinion.

         

        The measure aimed to decrease public spending for the welfare of 
illegal immigrants in Colorado and restrict access to administrative services, 
the ruling said.

         

        Proponents, who include former Democratic Gov. Dick Lamm, already had 
begun gathering petition signatures to get the measure on the ballot. The state 
Title Board approved the measure's language this spring.

         

        Activist Manolo Ganzales-Estay challenged the measure in court after 
the Title Board rejected his request to reconsider its approval of the 
initiative's language.

         

        Fred Elbel, director of Defend Colorado Now, has said if the court 
found a problem with the measure, he would revise it and supporters would begin 
gathering signatures anew.

         

        The measure would not stop the state from paying for federally mandated 
services such as public education or emergency medical care. But Elbel has said 
it would prevent illegal immigrants from receiving welfare and in-state college 
tuition.

         

        
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/12/AR2006061200541.html
 
<http://portal.mxlogic.com/redir/?1KrjLtYQsFIcTpdw0z6Q9OwhDm2RqjVv32Nt0J3blxfUjPoPBo_YjLtPbKoyDww2QXTsKUyDuXX2f0UTvHTKepshuo76XCWC8v4KgGSuxYitd1hYGjFRGDRzG5uZ1ISyPtCWpJ55-WbXWbXNJxYS2NF8Qg2ljWYq81DjPWPd40BI3hfcQg1vjfCy0dllAhzI9Cy0r_qdNYTfM-u0USyrhdFTpopvjuvhdQzmj7Jtz>
 

         

        Robin Bohannan 
        Director of Community Services 
        P.O. Box 471, Boulder, CO 80306 
        (303) 441-3996 (Ph) / (303) 441-4550 (Fx) 
        [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

        ********************************************************************** 
        This email and any attachments, from the Boulder County Department of 
Community Services, are confidential and intended solely for the user of the 
individual or entity to which it is addressed. The information contained herein 
may include protected or otherwise privileged information. Unauthorized review, 
forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is 
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in 
error, please notify the sender by reply to this message and delete the email 
without disclosure.

        
         


Reply via email to