Sounds just like an old-fashioned Boy Scout manual...

---------- Forwarded message ----------

> http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/snips__snails_opedcolumnists_christina_hoff_sommers.htm
>
> SNIPS & SNAILS
>
> By CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS
>
> May 31, 2007 -- PARENTS and educat ors are wringing their hands over
> the poor academic performance of boys. Girls are better readers, earn
> higher grades and are far more likely to go to college. America does a
> much better job educating girls than boys. But now, out of nowhere,
> comes a book that may hold the secret to male learning.
>
> "The Dangerous Book for Boys," written by two English brothers, Conn and
> Hal Iggulden, violates all the rules of political correctness - and
> males between the ages of 8 and 80 are reading it in droves.
>
> Already a major best seller in Great Britain, the book is now topping
> the lists in America. Its appeal is obvious - it goes directly for the
> pleasure centers of the male brain.
>
> "The Dangerous Book for Boys" is all about Swiss Army knives, compasses,
> tying knots and starting fires with a magnifying glass. It includes
> adventure stories with male heroes, vivid descriptions of battles and a
> history of artillery. Readers learn how to make their own magnets,
> periscopes and bows and arrows. It gives rules and tactics for poker and
> marbles - and secret moves for coin tricks.
>
> In a radical departure from modern schoolroom readings, the book has
> almost nothing to say about feelings, relationships or how boys can
> learn to cry. It valorizes risk, adventure and manliness.
>
> Today's boys inhabit a danger-averse world where even old favorites like
> tag and dodge ball are under a cloud - Too competitive! Someone
> might get hurt! The National Parent Teacher Association recommends a
> cooperative alternative to the fiercely competitive "tug of war" called
> "tug of peace."
>
> By contrast, "The Dangerous Book for Boys" has detailed instructions on
> how to hunt, kill, skin and cook a rabbit.
>
> Yet the book doesn't encourage boys to be Neanderthals. It tells them
> they have to become gentlemen. To this end, it offers lessons in
> manners, grammar and "seven poems every boy should know." It features an
> astute essay on that most mysterious of subjects, girls, and how to
> respect them, make friends with them and not to offend them.
>
> Today's teachers have been trained to regard boys and girls as
> cognitively and emotionally interchangeable. Common sense persuades most
> of us they are not, and now a rapidly growing body of neuroscientific
> evidence supports this conventional view.
>
> There are many exceptions, but here are the rules: Girls tend to have
> better verbal skills and enjoy a clear cognitive advantage in
> understanding people and human relationships. Boys, on average, have
> better spatial reasoning skills and tend to be keenly interested in
> systems and in mastering the rules that make things work.
>
> Educators studiously ignore all of this while they strive to avoid
> "gender bias." But even after being educated in today's gender-neutral
> schools, the career preferences of boys and girls continue to be
> markedly distinct. It is not social pressure that leads so many girls to
> become social workers, teachers and psychologists, and vast numbers of
> boys to be mechanics, carpenters or electrical engineers; it is their
> different innate propensities.
>
> The sad lesson of this book's success is how far our current education
> culture has drifted from the world of boys. The special art of teaching
> boys - once so well understood by educators everywhere - is at risk of
> being lost forever.
>
> One literacy expert reviewed several junior-high social studies texts
> and concluded: "Many students may well end up thinking that the West was
> settled chiefly by females, most often accompanied by their parents."
>
> In her alarming book, "The Language Police," education historian Diane
> Ravitch describes how "sensitivity and bias committees" in our leading
> publishing houses now routinely expunge from textbooks and standardized
> tests all mention of potentially upsetting topics. Two major publishing
> companies specifically interdict references to frightening animals such
> as rats, mice, roaches and snakes.
>
> "The Dangerous Book for Boys" will send bias and sensitivity committees
> into turmoil - but its very success may eventually put them out of
> business.
>
> Will girls like the book too? Some will. But it is boys who are the coin
> collectors, adventure buffs, card tricksters and systematizers of the
> species. I showed the book to a 22-year-old man I know. He leafed
> through it and exclaimed: "I would have loved this as a kid!" He was
> mesmerized by instructions for how to make the "greatest paper airplane
> in the world." I suspect such lore will not light up the neural
> circuitry of females.
>
> Unless, of course, they are mothers who happen to notice that their sons
> have fallen in love with this wonderful, wholesome, delightfully
> instructive anachronism of a book.
>
> Christina Hoff Sommers, a resident scholar at the American
> Enterprise Institute, is the author of "The War Against Boys" and
> "Who Stole Feminism?"
>
>
>
>
>


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boysed/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boysed/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to