I could look at doing this with bpython-curtsies, but if all you want is colorized stack traces, capturing all output as bpython-curtsies does might be too heavy - you change how stack traces are printed somewhere, it's some handler in sys or traceback.
Right now running a script with bpython just uses the normal python executable, but it could be made to run after some shimming to get more bpython-like stack traces... On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Giampaolo Rodola <[email protected]> wrote: > This is something I've been looking for for a while now: the possibility to > run a python script via "b/python foo.py" and have colorized tracebacks. > Whereas bpython provides colorized output for the interactive shell it does > not provide any when running a python script through it. > In particular this would be useful to emphasise traceback's file paths in > order to figure out where the different tree originated from. > I'm currently using this: > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xtraceback/0.2 > ...but it only works for the interactive interpreter. > Would such a feature be feasible to integrate into bpython? > Bye and thanks for your great effort. > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "bpython" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpython. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bpython" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpython. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
