On 3/16/2011 2:55 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: > that's the shining highlight of the BrailleNote. Not to say insignificant, > but really, quality control has a lot to do with it, and if I wanted a device > which did decent braille I could have just as easily stuck with the classic. > I didn't, obviously, because there's a strong incentive to getting everything > (or as much as possible) into one device. Or to put it another way, it's not > sufficient to be content with a braille notetaker that isn't at least a > satisfactory PDA of equivalent specification in the mainstream world. YMMV, > IMHO, etc. Anything less is merely a dumb braille terminal (which function in > BrailleNote QT is also broken). > I agree with you Think about this, and this is true, you ave to agree. All sited people have PDA's, cellphones, ETC, but guess what, look at what they can do? And we have a PDA but bairly can web browse!
> Now, again, I don't dislike the BrailleNote, but if it's going to be a > do-it-all device, it has to live up to the standard. Functionality is one > part of it; polish another. The legacy of braille support is clearly not > enough to keep people from upgrading their units. We want more, dammit! > That's so true, I agree with that as well. We want a PDA that can do just as mutch as the Sited pda users can do. It's not fair to us to have to be stuck with something that half works, and they get all the stuff that does. ___ Replies to this message will go directly to the sender. If your reply would be useful to the list, please send a copy to the list as well. To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to [email protected] To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit http://list.humanware.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
