if you want to adjust inflection and stuff like that, the best speech for that 
is the ibm viavoice outloud text to speech engine. Oh, and that may be a better 
choice for us people like myself majoring in language.

Josh


> ----- Original Message -----
>From: Jerry Weinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Braillenote List <[email protected]
>Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 20:11:29 -0700
>Subject: Re: [Braillenote] Keynote Gold Speech

>Dear jonathan,
>I find Keynote Gold excellent in most cases.  If I may offfer constructive 
>criticism, at high speech rates, the decTALK for me is clearer.  And I agree 
>with you that this is subjective.  Indeed, giving us, the end users, more 
>voices and adjustments upon these voices, would allow each one of us to tailor 
>the speech to our personal taste.  I for instence, might be able to tweak 
>Keynote Gold so I could understand it at higher speeds.

>One adjustment that I would like added, but do not see in any of the synthetic 
>or sampled speech is an adjustment on speech inflection.  I might turn it 
>higher for fiction, and turn it lower for scientific journels.

>Keep up the good work.

>Sincerely,
>Jerry Weinger






>> ----- Original Message -----
>>From: Jonathan Mosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To: Braillenote List <[email protected]
>>Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 14:21:01 +1200
>>Subject: Re: [Braillenote] Keynote Gold Speech

>>Hi Linda.  I've changed the subject line to reply to your comments about
>>Keynote Gold speech.  One thing we can certainly say about speech is that
>>just as beauty is supposedly in the eye of the beholder, good synthesised
>>speech is in the ear of the listener.  I've used Keynote Gold speech for a
>>long time now and as a user rather than a Pulse Data employee, I consider
>>it the best speech there is.  I say this because it's responsive, and the
>>most accurate I have heard.  If Keynote Gold mispronounces something,
>>chances are very high that it's a typo.

>>That said, yes we are actively pursuing widening the choice of speech
>>engines to suit people's tastes.  The voices you mention for example are
>>digitised, rather than synthesised speech.  They use tiny samples of human
>>speech to construct the sounds you hear.  They are excellent at normal
>>reading speed when you're listening to a long document, but tend to be
>>less desirable at very fast rates or when editing.  So the more choice we
>>can put in the hands of customers, the better.  Hope this helps.


>>Jonathan Mosen
>>BrailleNote Product Marketing Manager
>>Pulse Data International Ltd

>>DDI: +64-3-373-6192
>>Fax:  +64-3-384 4933
>>Mobile: +64-21 466 736
>>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Internet: www.pulsedata.com
>>___
>>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote



>___
>To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
>http://list.pulsedata.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote



Reply via email to