On Fri, 8 May 2009 15:31:43 -0600
Daniel Robbins <drobb...@funtoo.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am trying to figure out how to get a persistent, non-changing MAC
> address assigned to a bridge. It looks like there is new functionality
> in 2.6.27 to allow this to happen, specifically, in:
>
> void br_stp_recalculate_bridge_id(struct net_bridge *br)
> [...]
> /* user has chosen a value so keep it */
> if (br->flags & BR_SET_MAC_ADDR)
> return;
>
> and in..
>
> static int br_set_mac_address(struct net_device *dev, void *p)
> [...]
> br->flags |= BR_SET_MAC_ADDR;
>
> However, I cannot get this functionality to work as it appears it
> should. If I manually set a bridge's MAC address to an arbitrary
> value, as follows:
>
> # ifconfig br0 hw ether "xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx"
>
> Then, subsequent calls such as the following seem to still change the
> bridge's MAC address:
>
> # brctl addif br0 veth100.0
> # brctl delif br0 veth100.0
>
> Am I doing something wrong? What is the proper way to take advantage
> of the new code in 2.6.27?
>
> The only mechanism that I have found that appears to achieve my
> desired result is application of Deitmar Maurer's 2.6.24 patch which,
> after being applied, seems to disable the dynamic nature of the
> bridge's MAC, so that br0 persistently uses the MAC of the first
> interface that was added to the bridge. Here is this patch that seems
> to be working for me:
>
> --- linux-2.6.24-openvz.org/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c.org 2008-06-11
> 09:15:16.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.24-openvz.org/net/bridge/br_stp_if.c 2008-06-11
> 09:44:53.000000000 +0200
> @@ -217,10 +217,7 @@
> struct net_bridge_port *p;
>
> list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
> - if (addr == br_mac_zero ||
> - memcmp(p->dev->dev_addr, addr, ETH_ALEN) < 0)
> - addr = p->dev->dev_addr;
> -
> + addr = p->dev->dev_addr;
> }
>
> if (compare_ether_addr(br->bridge_id.addr, addr))
> --------------------------
>
> However, when I look at the 2.6.27 source code, it seems like this
> patch should no longer be needed and an "ifconfig br0 hw ether
> "xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx" should be sufficient. Am I doing something wrong?
>
> Thanks for your time,
>
> Daniel Robbins
It was fixed by:
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemmin...@vyatta.com> 2008-06-17 16:10:06
Committer: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net> 2008-06-17 16:10:06
Parent: 0b040829952d84bf2a62526f0e24b624e0699447 (net: remove CVS keywords)
Branches: master, remotes/origin/master
Follows: v2.6.26-rc6
Precedes: v2.6.27-rc1
bridge: make bridge address settings sticky
Normally, the bridge just chooses the smallest mac address as the
bridge id and mac address of bridge device. But if the administrator
has explictly set the interface address then don't change it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemmin...@vyatta.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
_______________________________________________
Bridge mailing list
Bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
