On 2017/10/04 14:12, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> 
> This patch adds a new bridge port flag BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS to
> suppress arp and nd flood on bridge ports. It implements
> rfc7432, section 10.
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7432#section-10
> for ethernet VPN deployments. It is similar to the existing
> BR_ARP_PROXY flag but has a few semantic differences to conform
> to EVPN standard. In case of EVPN, it is mainly used to
> avoid flooding to tunnel ports like vxlan. Unlike the existing
> flags it suppresses flood of all neigh discovery packets
> (arp, nd) to tunnel ports.
> 
> This patch adds netlink and sysfs support to set this bridge port
> flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <ro...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> index dea88a2..d8c2706 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static inline size_t br_port_info_size(void)
>               + nla_total_size(1)     /* IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP */
>               + nla_total_size(1)     /* IFLA_BRPORT_PROXYARP_WIFI */
>               + nla_total_size(1)     /* IFLA_BRPORT_VLAN_TUNNEL */
> +             + nla_total_size(1)     /* IFLA_BRPORT_NEIGH_SUPPRESS */
>               + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct ifla_bridge_id)) /* 
> IFLA_BRPORT_ROOT_ID */
>               + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct ifla_bridge_id)) /* 
> IFLA_BRPORT_BRIDGE_ID */
>               + nla_total_size(sizeof(u16))   /* IFLA_BRPORT_DESIGNATED_PORT 
> */
> @@ -210,7 +211,9 @@ static int br_port_fill_attrs(struct sk_buff *skb,
>           nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_CONFIG_PENDING, p->config_pending) ||
>           nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_VLAN_TUNNEL, !!(p->flags &
>                                                       BR_VLAN_TUNNEL)) ||
> -         nla_put_u16(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_GROUP_FWD_MASK, p->group_fwd_mask))
> +         nla_put_u16(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_GROUP_FWD_MASK, p->group_fwd_mask) ||
> +         nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BRPORT_NEIGH_SUPPRESS, !!(p->flags &
> +                                                     BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS)))

Wouldn't it be better to make the indentation like this?

... !!(p->flags &
       BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS)))

>               return -EMSGSIZE;
>  
>       timerval = br_timer_value(&p->message_age_timer);
> @@ -692,6 +695,7 @@ static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct 
> nlattr *tb[])
>  {
>       unsigned long old_flags = p->flags;
>       bool br_vlan_tunnel_old = false;
> +     int neigh_suppress_old = 0;
>       int err;
>  
>       err = br_set_port_flag(p, tb, IFLA_BRPORT_MODE, BR_HAIRPIN_MODE);
> @@ -785,6 +789,12 @@ static int br_setport(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct 
> nlattr *tb[])
>               p->group_fwd_mask = fwd_mask;
>       }
>  
> +     neigh_suppress_old = (p->flags & BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS);
> +     br_set_port_flag(p, tb, IFLA_BRPORT_NEIGH_SUPPRESS,
> +                      BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS);
> +     if (neigh_suppress_old != (p->flags & BR_NEIGH_SUPPRESS))
> +             br_recalculate_neigh_suppress_enabled(p->br);
> +

You are calling br_recalculate_neigh_suppress_enabled() from within
br_port_flags_change() immediately after this.
I think you can just call br_set_port_flag() here.

>       br_port_flags_change(p, old_flags ^ p->flags);
>       return 0;
>  }

-- 
Toshiaki Makita

Reply via email to