On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 00:20, Vladimir Oltean <olte...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 11:03:18AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>> Add the usual trampoline functionality from the generic DSA layer down
>> to the drivers for MST state changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tob...@waldekranz.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/dsa.h | 2 ++
>> net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 2 ++
>> net/dsa/port.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> net/dsa/slave.c | 6 ++++++
>> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>> index cc8acb01bd9b..096e6e3a8e1e 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>> @@ -943,6 +943,8 @@ struct dsa_switch_ops {
>> struct dsa_bridge bridge);
>> void (*port_stp_state_set)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> u8 state);
>> + int (*port_mst_state_set)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> + const struct switchdev_mst_state *state);
>> void (*port_fast_age)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);
>> int (*port_pre_bridge_flags)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>> struct switchdev_brport_flags flags,
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>> index 87ec0697e92e..a620e079ebc5 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>> @@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ static inline struct net_device
>> *dsa_master_find_slave(struct net_device *dev,
>> void dsa_port_set_tag_protocol(struct dsa_port *cpu_dp,
>> const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops);
>> int dsa_port_set_state(struct dsa_port *dp, u8 state, bool do_fast_age);
>> +int dsa_port_set_mst_state(struct dsa_port *dp,
>> + const struct switchdev_mst_state *state);
>> int dsa_port_enable_rt(struct dsa_port *dp, struct phy_device *phy);
>> int dsa_port_enable(struct dsa_port *dp, struct phy_device *phy);
>> void dsa_port_disable_rt(struct dsa_port *dp);
>> diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c
>> index 5f45cb7d70ba..26cfbc8ab499 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/port.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/port.c
>> @@ -108,6 +108,36 @@ int dsa_port_set_state(struct dsa_port *dp, u8 state,
>> bool do_fast_age)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int dsa_port_set_mst_state(struct dsa_port *dp,
>> + const struct switchdev_mst_state *state)
>> +{
>> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>> + int err, port = dp->index;
>> +
>> + if (!ds->ops->port_mst_state_set)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> + err = ds->ops->port_mst_state_set(ds, port, state);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + if (!dsa_port_can_configure_learning(dp) || dp->learning) {
>> + switch (state->state) {
>> + case BR_STATE_DISABLED:
>> + case BR_STATE_BLOCKING:
>> + case BR_STATE_LISTENING:
>> + /* Ideally we would only fast age entries
>> + * belonging to VLANs controlled by this
>> + * MST.
>> + */
>> + dsa_port_fast_age(dp);
>
> Does mv88e6xxx support this? If it does, you might just as well
> introduce another variant of ds->ops->port_fast_age() for an msti.
You can limit ATU operations to a particular FID. So the way I see it we
could either have:
int (*port_vlan_fast_age)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u16 vid)
+ Maybe more generic. You could imagine there being a way to trigger
this operation from userspace for example.
- We would have to keep the VLAN<->MSTI mapping in the DSA layer in
order to be able to do the fan-out in dsa_port_set_mst_state.
or:
int (*port_msti_fast_age)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u16 msti)
+ Let's the mapping be an internal affair in the driver.
- Perhaps, less generically useful.
Which one do you prefer? Or is there a hidden third option? :)
> And since it is new code, you could require that drivers _do_ support
> configuring learning before they could support MSTP. After all, we don't
> want to keep legacy mechanisms in place forever.
By "configuring learning", do you mean this new fast-age-per-vid/msti,
or being able to enable/disable learning per port? If it's the latter,
I'm not sure I understand how those two are related.
