On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 17:21:37 +0200
Hans Schultz <net...@kapio-technology.com> wrote:

>  
> @@ -493,6 +496,8 @@ static int fdb_modify(int cmd, int flags, int argc, char 
> **argv)
>                       req.ndm.ndm_flags |= NTF_EXT_LEARNED;
>               } else if (matches(*argv, "sticky") == 0) {
>                       req.ndm.ndm_flags |= NTF_STICKY;
> +             } else if (matches(*argv, "blackhole") == 0) {
> +                     ext_flags |= NTF_EXT_BLACKHOLE;
>               } else {
>                       if (strcmp(*argv, "to") == 0)
>                               NEXT_ARG();

The parsing of flags is weird here, most of the flags are compared with strcmp()
but some use matches()..  I should have used strcmp() all the time; but at the
time did not realize what kind of confusion matches() can cause.

Reply via email to