On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 06:25:46PM +0200, Petr Machata wrote:
> @@ -635,6 +648,7 @@ static void bridge_print_opt(struct link_util *lu, FILE 
> *f, struct rtattr *tb[])
>  
>       if (tb[IFLA_BR_MULTI_BOOLOPT]) {
>               __u32 mofn_bit = 1 << BR_BOOLOPT_MDB_OFFLOAD_FAIL_NOTIFICATION;
> +             __u32 fdb_vlan_0_bit = 1 << BR_BOOLOPT_FDB_LOCAL_VLAN_0;
>               __u32 mcvl_bit = 1 << BR_BOOLOPT_MCAST_VLAN_SNOOPING;
>               __u32 no_ll_learn_bit = 1 << BR_BOOLOPT_NO_LL_LEARN;
>               __u32 mst_bit = 1 << BR_BOOLOPT_MST_ENABLE;
> @@ -661,6 +675,11 @@ static void bridge_print_opt(struct link_util *lu, FILE 
> *f, struct rtattr *tb[])
>                                  "mdb_offload_fail_notification",
>                                  "mdb_offload_fail_notification %u ",
>                                  !!(bm->optval & mofn_bit));
> +             if (bm->optval & fdb_vlan_0_bit)

Shouldn't this be 'bm->optmask' ?

> +                     print_uint(PRINT_ANY,
> +                                "fdb_local_vlan_0",
> +                                "fdb_local_vlan_0 %u ",
> +                                !!(bm->optval & fdb_vlan_0_bit));
>       }
>  
>       if (tb[IFLA_BR_MCAST_ROUTER])

Reply via email to