> @@ -1594,10 +1592,11 @@ void dsa_switch_shutdown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>       }
>
>       /* Disconnect from further netdevice notifiers on the conduit,
> -      * since netdev_uses_dsa() will now return false.
> +      * from now on, netdev_uses_dsa_currently() will return false.
>        */
>       dsa_switch_for_each_cpu_port(dp, ds)
> -             dp->conduit->dsa_ptr = NULL;
> +             rcu_assign_pointer(dp->conduit->dsa_ptr, NULL);
> +     synchronize_rcu();
>
>       rtnl_unlock();
>  out:

Hi, I am a newbie here. Thanks for the opportunity for learning more
about rcu.
Wouldn't it make more sense to call synchronize_rcu after rtnl_unlock?

Reply via email to