On October 4, 2025 4:19:25 PM GMT+03:00, "Linus Lüssing" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 12:07:43PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote: >> My 2c, it is ok to special case vlan 0 as it is illegal to use, so it can be >> used >> to match on "special" entries like this. > >I'm probably missing some context, but why would VLAN 0 be illegal >to use? Isn't VLAN 0 used for untagged frames with priorities? A >priority tagged frame? > >Regards, Linus
Sure it is, I said it in the context of the bridge which doesn't have such support. Cheers, Nik
