|
Hello everybody. I'll try to explain my problem the
best i can.
After setting up the tunnel between a simple win xp
station and a bridged linux box (only with the eth0 and the tap bridged),
sending also either the vpn data and the normal data over the same
ethernet, can i set an internal tap IP in the linux bridged station in
order to receive tunneled data for itself?
If not, the XP station will never be able to send
tunneled data to the Linux one. Can you understand me?
I'm really stressed about the issue, i've tried
everything in the route table, adding the remote (XP) subnet mask in a new
virtual interface (ifconfig eth0 add MyVirtual [since you can not set any IP to
the tap one]) as a new route with the tap interface as gateway (rather
than the br0/eth0). Didn't work. Which do you think that is the
problem?
Can't i actually add another 'virtual' interface
only for having the supposed to have TAP IP in this other interface, just like a
trick, and to really use the tap one as gateway to send and receive tunneled
data? I gues that not, because that interface will be not bridged, and then
will be not able to send the traffic across the TAP one..?
Thanks |
_______________________________________________ Bridge mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/bridge
