7/19/02

Dearest --

Wow, two letters in one day!  I was considering the specific reasons why 
Mohandas and Martin differ in outlook, strength of character, and yet take 
the very same course of action in their history of events in their lifetimes. 
 The foundation of their philosophies is completely different, love, and you 
know that.  Ghandi is played by Ben Kingsley, an Englishman, at the request 
of the Hindus and Pakistanis.

Why would they do this, knowing filmmaking inside and out, and knowing their 
"Bapu" enough to entrust 300 million lives to the word of one goatherd?  It 
is interesting to note that Martin Luther King started as a preacher, and 
moved away from his religious base in pursuit of the same spirituality of 
Ghandi, while Ghandi started out as a London-bred street lawyer and moved 
toward a generic Indian spirituality as he became more and more vital to the 
struggle for an independent India.

I should need to say little more than I already have.  First and foremost, 
the United States is not the British Empire, and Alabama does not have 300 
million ethnically united but religiously divided people without autonomy.  I 
should need to say little more.

Or perhaps, I should need to say little more given the context of a 
historical timeline pre- and post- WW2, especially in the frame of our 
present third millennium.  In 1946, the world needed Mohandas Ghandi and he 
was conveniently placed there from his history [of civil rights activity] in 
South Africa decades before WW2.  WTF was or is Martin Luther King?  Who 
exactly manufactured this man?  I actually don't need to know, having read a 
letter from a jail in Selma.  Yes, the Red Foxx Thelma, in _Sanford & Son_ [I 
was thinking of Esther, perhaps also Wilma Rudolph, but most probably Lemont].

I find the civil rights movement steaming along after the sudden independence 
of many nation-states in the late 40's, prodigious and efficacious case law 
in the 50's, spiritual and artistic development and endeavor in the 50's, and 
television, in the 50's.  The sixties seem to me to be what George Harrison 
saw of the Haight-Ashbury in 1968:  look it up.  Timothy Leary.  the 1960's 
were an awful time to live and to die; the 70's much better and I'm glad to 
have spent my childhood there.  Anyway darling, I'm out of paper again, so 
I'll end this letter here.  I love you.

Mark

<snip kanji for "bi" or "fire"> 

Reply via email to