--- Matt Grimaldi wrote: > > Julia Thompson wrote: > > > > > >> I think that is a badder thing to do than (...) > > > > > > Speaking of which, you missed one such > exception. Shouldn't it be > > > "worse", not "badder"? :) > > > > > Alberto Monteiro wrote: > > > > No, it should be "ungooder" > > > > No, it should be "plus ungood", or "double plus > ungood" if more emphasis is required. > > -- Matt
I must disagree - the appropriate word is of course "worsest," although "most worst" is in vogue in Zwolle, Louisiana, with "most dreadfully worst" a close second. <G> Not To Be Confused With Worsted Maru __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! http://sbc.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
