At 11:17 29-11-2002 -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:
You have so far received 10 messages off-list from me that the list censors did not want you to read. The first nine of them were sent in a time frame of 2-3 minutes (the tenth was sent approx. 12 hours later). Please explain how (given the above definition of mailbombing) this can be considered a mailbombing or mailgrenading, and how sending nine messages over a period of three minutes can overload a mailbox or a mailserver. Take into account that when you download your Brin-L mail, you often download significantly more messages within the same time frame of 2-3 minutes, without disrupting anything.> >GSV And Don't Get Me Started On The Resident Brin-L Mail-Bomber > > I assume you are referring to me. Well, I can assure that I have never > been involved in any mailbombing. At > http://www.nku.edu/~rkdrury/emailppt/tsld021.htm, mailbombing is correctly > defined as: "Enough email intentionally delivered to a mailbox to overload > it or its host system". I have never done such a thing. But you are of > course free to prove me wrong.More like mailgrenading!
Jeroen "Moderation is evil, why it must be eradicated" van Baardwijk
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
