On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:12:49PM +0000, Richard Baker wrote:

> I don't see why she'd use Webmail anyway. She says it's "easier", but
> she's never actually tried to use a proper mail client.

Well, one reason I can think of: if you move around a lot and check
email, an Internet-wide accessible mailbox is handy. Webmail is one way
to do that. I share your opinion of webmail, though, and I am fortunate
enough to have broadband always-on access to the web from my home, so
my Linux box can always be telnet'ed or VNC'd to from anywhere I am so
I can check mail (and I also keep lots of useful information, data,
and programs there that can be accessed from anywhere with an Internet
connection).

But if you aren't technically inclined, setting up a system like I have
could seem difficult. So, from your sister's point of view, I can see
why she would say webmail is easier (if she needs to be able to access
her email from more than one place)


> Similarly, it's "easier" to use a handful of different IM clients than
> to use one of the unified clients like Jabber or Trillian.

That one I can't explain...

> It's enough to make me despair.

I know what you mean. I've been trying for years to convince my Dad to
get a broadband connection for his home. He says he doesn't use the
Internet enough to justify the cost of broadband. Of course, whenever I
telephone him I get a busy signal because he is using the modem....


-- 
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       http://www.erikreuter.net/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to