Kevin Tarr wrote:

> I think the most successful tactic is for the US to not give into threats.
> DPRNK broke one specific treaty. "Oh let's be nice, give them a few more
> millions of dollars, and not notice the nuclear weapon(s)." That's your
> response?

I'm not sure that that should be the measure. Every country now and again changes
it's political outlook and as a result feels that it has to nullify contracts
that made good sense at the time they were signed.

Maybe if North Korea thinks it has lost face, it makes some kind of (albeit
warped) sense that it tries to recover that by visably breaking that which has
made it lose face in the first place. Considering this I'm not so sure that
Bushes exessive victory poses didn't contribute to the resulting mess. It's maybe
looking nice to the American people but he's trampling over an awfull lot of
foreign toes.

I think that it is tremendously important to understand the people you are trying
to achieve something with/from. And quite frankly imho Bush isn't the man to
acomplish that ever. He is such an elephant. But as I said that is only my
opinion.

Sonja

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to