--- Jon Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> >What is your position on the death penalty - i.e.,
> is it morally justifiable or not?

Hmm, I realize that maybe this topic was hashed
thoroughly before I joined, so if it was divisive I
withdraw the question.

> >My personal opinion is that it is justifiable for
> the state to execute persons who have been proven
> beyond a
> >reasonable doubt to have committed heinous crimes;
> the (past?) problem with the death penalty is that
it
> has fallen disproportionately on the poor/non-white,
> > with less-than-reasonable evidence.
> 
<snip> 
> I'm of two minds on the subject.
> 
> My predominant opinion matches something I once
> heard Dennis MIller say, 
> which is that the Death Penalty is society's way of
> telling someone that the 
> crime they have committed is so awful, so terrible
> and so horrific that the 
> rest of us have decided it's time for them to go. 
> 'Sorry, we just can't 
> share the same planet.  That's the way it's gotta
> be.'
> 
> However, my conscience has forced me to vote against
> pro-death penalty 
> candidates in the past.  I do honestly believe that
> in some rare cases 
> capital punishment is appropriate.  But an impartial
> jury needs to prove 
> beyond a shadow of a doubt that your defendant
> committed the crime s/he was 
> accused of and that s/he can't be rehabilitated.  Is
> the defendent still a 
> clear threat to people?  It seems these questions
> are rarely considered 
> these days and therein lies my personal concern
> about the system.  I know 
> that life is messy.  Sometimes you can't be certain.
>  But I do believe that 
> often, we could try harder to track down the truth.

Yes, which is why I can understand the IL governor
(IIRC) commuting sentences before he left office,
considering the several men in that state proven 'at
the last moment' to be *not guilty* of the crimes for
which they'd been convicted; it would probaly have
been more logical (but maybe not legally feasible?) to
"hold" further executions while cases were
re-examined.  I agree that I would want irrefutable
evidence of the (heinous) crime before agreeing to
execution; otherwise, a life sentence would have to
suffice.
 
<snip> 
> And then you have OJ, who's scouring golf courses
> all over the South looking for the 'real killers'.

<snort>
Does anyone know offhand how many _truly rich_ persons
have been given the death penalty in recent times?

Debbi

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to