<<I know of no instance in which Limbaugh contest the right of a citizen to have his or her medical records protected from unreasonable search.
The editorial which prompted the title for this thread referenced a case in which the Supreme Court held that the Constitution emmanated a penumbra from which was brought forth a right to privacy that protected one's right to do whatever one wanted, even when the police should happen to stumble
into said bedroom on a legal search warrant.
Clearly, the two are very much different.>>
***
Are we discussing Lawrence and Garner versus Texas, which established that people have a right to sexual privacy in their own bedrooms, free from the meddling of state laws criminalizing their adult, consensual sexual behaviour?
That descision is documented here: http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/26jun20031200/www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/02-102.pdf or http://tinyurl.com/fcbr
I believe that the only mention of a penumbra of privacy was in Scallia's discenting opinion. There's a huge difference between "one's right to do what ever one wanted" and ones right to consensual sexual behavior in private.
If you have a cite for any descision that created or even discussed a right to do what ever one wants, I'd like to see it.
-- Doug _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
