"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > At 10:18 PM 3/6/04, Robert Seeberger wrote: > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 9:33 PM > >Subject: Re: States Bent on Collecting Internet Taxes > > > > > > > "Ronn!Blankenship" wrote: > > > > > > > > At 03:46 PM 3/6/04, Julia Thompson wrote: > > > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/6/2004 1:58:30 PM US Mountain Standard > >Time, > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > But (if your locality is like many, where property taxes are > >the major > > > > > > > source of funding for schools) "what about the children?" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Ronn! :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "They taste good with ketchup." > > > > > > > > > > > > ---Smaug, get out of here. You're in the wrong string of > >messages. > > > > > > > > > >But are they crunchy? > > > > > > > > If they're battered heavily enough . . . > > > > > > But excessive bone-breaking in advance would make them less crunchy, > >I > > > would think. > > > > >I think the battering is simply to tenderize them........as if they > >were not tender enough! <G> > > It is curious that apparently no one (including the mother of young > children) interpreted "battered children" to mean dipping them in a mixture > of corn meal, milk, and spices, rather than beating them violently . . .
It was just more interesting to interpret it the way I did. I figured you meant it the one way, and I'd be contrary and take it the other way. :)
Actually, I'd be surprised if you didn't know me well enough by now to know that of course I had both meanings in mind . . .
-- Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
