> From: Gary Nunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I immediately thought that it might be Lander debris, but the close-up > shows that it has definitely been there for a while. Another > observation, in the larger image, the rock and the object > both look like > they were recently moved. The dust around the rock and the object has > sharp breaks instead of the wind worn dusty look. Compare the dust > around the large rock with the dust surrounding the smaller rocks.
At first glance, I thought it was an impression made by the Lander as it bounced or a print from a lander leg or something. But the closeup definitely looks like something under ground. Weird. I wonder if the rover might have moved those rocks? - jmh _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
