In a war that could go on for decades, you cannot simply detain people indefinitely on the sole authority of the secretary of Defense
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4933882/ .... The basic attitude taken by Rumsfeld, Cheney and their top aides has been "We're at war; all these niceties will have to wait." As a result, we have waged pre-emptive war unilaterally, spurned international cooperation, rejected United Nations participation, humiliated allies, discounted the need for local support in Iraq and incurred massive costs in blood and treasure. If the world is not to be trusted in these dangerous times, key agencies of the American government, like the State Department, are to be trusted even less. Congress is barely informed, even on issues on which its "advise and consent" are constitutionally mandated. Leave process aside: the results are plain. On almost every issue involving postwar Iraqâtroop strength, international support, the credibility of exiles, de-Baathification, handling Ayatollah Ali SistaniâWashington's assumptions and policies have been wrong. By now most have been reversed, often too late to have much effect. This strange combination of arrogance and incompetence has not only destroyed the hopes for a new Iraq. It has had the much broader effect of turning the United States into an international outlaw in the eyes of much of the world. Whether he wins or loses in November, George W. Bush's legacy is now clear: the creation of a poisonous atmosphere of anti-Americanism around the globe. I'm sure he takes full responsibility. Gary #1 on google for liberal news
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
