At 10:01 AM 10/26/2004 -0500 Horn, John wrote: >> Behalf Of iaamoac >> >> Just days after Bush's now-controversial State of the Union >Address >> in 2003, Clinton declared: "After what happened on 9/11, the will >of >> the international community has stiffened, as represented by this >> last U.N. resolution, which said clearly that the penalty for >> noncompliance is no longer sanctions." > >My only response after reading this article is "so?" So Clinton >doesn't agree with Kerry on Iraq. OK. I don't recall the Democrats >demanding all Kerry supports to be in lock step with him in order to >support Kerry. Heck, I was grudgingly in favor of the war in Iraq >before it happened. Not so much now. > >OK. Not at all.
I think the key point is that Dr. Brin holds up Bill Clinton as the paragon of a good Presidency, and strikes down Bush - particularly the handling of the Iraq War - as a paragon of a bad Presidency. It is interesting to note Bill Clinton's approval of how Bush handled the Iraq situation - especially since Bill Clinton's statements on Iraq are irreconciliable with Brin's statements on Iraq. JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
