On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:07:02AM -0600, Robert Seeberger wrote:

> Thunderbird does a similar act with threading and it seems to work
> pretty good. Is there any way to change the look of Mutt?

I was curious how threading compared on mutt, Thunderbird, and mail.app.
A google turned up this post:

http://64.233.187.104/search?q=cache:IQOnx2gc2_oJ:grove.ufl.edu/~dwc/archives/cat_internet.html+Thunderbird+threading+mutt&hl=en&client=firefox-a

http://urlsnip.com/699033

>    Since I've been away from my computers at home, I've decided to try
>    a couple of IMAP clients. At work, I'm trying Mozilla Thunderbird
>    0.8. On my laptop, I'm trying Apple Mail 1.3.9 (v619).

>    Normally, I use fetchmail, procmail, and mutt. I probably get
>    close to 200 messages a day (mostly mailing lists), so automatic
>    filtering and proper threading is a must.

>    Thunderbird manages to get threading mostly correct, but it
>    sometimes places replies in the wrong place in the tree. It looks
>    like the threading code is basing much of its decisions on the
>    Subject: header, when it really should be using References: and
>    In-Reply-To:. It also has filtering, but I haven't tried it because
>    I want everything to stay in my inbox so I can download my mail
>    easily.

>    Apple Mail has very lame threading support. When you select a
>    message, it highlights messages in the same thread. It doesn't, by
>    default, group threads or let you collapse them. There is an option
>    to group "discussions", but it only threads one level deep. A reply
>    to a reply appears at the same level as the first reply. Mail also
>    has filtering, but I haven't tried it.

>    One feature of Apple Mail that I really like is the ability to
>    combine your IMAP folders across different accounts into one. The
>    contents of my overall inbox is the union of the contents of each
>    account's inbox. The same applies for my Sent folder and my Trash
>    folder. The only place you notice the fact you have multiple
>    accounts is when composing an email, and normally the program
>    chooses the right account for the From: line.

>    Thunderbird doesn't really make any effort to hide the fact you
>    have multiple accounts. You can't (as far as I can tell) combine
>    mailboxes so they act sensibly. You can't set a default signature
>    for all accounts; you have to specify one for each account.

>    I guess if I had to use a graphical email client, I'd probably
>    choose Apple Mail. But it really needs better threading support -
>    maybe that will come in the next version of Mac OS X.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to