At 04:53 PM 4/7/2005 -0700, Dave Land wrote:
>> It means that there wasn't a third option between
>> going to war to remove Hussein and leaving him in
>> power.  It didn't exist.  No one proposed one that was
>> even vaguely plausible.  You could choose one or the
>> other.
>
>Substantial long-term support for the internal opposition
>to Hussein would have been a third way: neither "going to
>war" nor "leaving him in power." At the very least, we
>would have avoided being seen and opposed as occupiers,
>and at the best, we might have been credited with having
>"uplifted" the Iraqis.

We tried that for 12 years.  

That same policy, of course, has worked very effectively for the last 40+
years in Cuba as well.....

JDG - "Next", Maru.....
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to