* Gary Denton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > There is never any factual content he indicates he is disagreeing with > and
Never? There is something stated as fact which is incorrect. The Brin-L archives provide ample evidence. Of course, if Gary hadn't used the word never, but "rarely", then Gary would of course be correct. Since Gary rarely states any unambiguous facts, it is rather difficult to have factual disagreements. As everyone has no doubt already noticed, Gary tends to make a lot of vague statements, sometimes with ambiguous appeals to perceived authority, that upon closer examination are no more meaningful than an Eliza response. The only pattern is that they always follow a certain politics. As long as my conclusions were agreeing with Gary's politics, he was full of praise. Only when a liberal policy or politician is criticized is there a problem with the methodology. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l