----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Denton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <brin-l@mccmedia.com> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 12:26 AM Subject: Cover-up or protection?
>More than 500,000 kids currently suffer from autism, >and pediatricians diagnose more than 40,000 new cases every year. The >disease was unknown until 1943, when it was identified and diagnosed >among 11 children born in the months after thimerosal was first added >to baby vaccines in 1931. I looked at when autism is diagnosed and found at http://www.neurologychannel.com/autism/diagnosis.shtml "Diagnosis of autism is usually made by the age of 3." In Gary's post, (and basically confirmed elsewhere, the only shot given to kids under 3 that still has thimerosal are the flu shots, which are very rarely given. If thimerosal is the culpet, shouldn't diagnosis of autism be reduced to false positives? Dan M. Plumber Maru _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
