In a message dated 6/23/2005 8:41:02 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

"Any  property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but
the  fallout from this decision will not be random," O'Connor  wrote


Oh hell yes.
 
I don't think the law on civic improvements has changed either. In Phoenix  a 
big developer put up a 20 story tower in what was a residential area. The  
homes on the other side of the street had to pay for a part of the new sewer  
that had to be put in. Payment was based upon property frontage to the street.  
Ten homes had to pay half of what was needed for 400 offices.
 
So it goes. So it goes.
 
 
 
William  Taylor
---------------------
Good words on page I do forbear
Not pulled  out from my derriere.
Blest be the man who says, 'Writes well.'
And cursed  be he that makes me spell.
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to