> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dan Minette > > So, I'm really curious. How does networking form the basis for a new > paradigm that is so clearly correct, that those who look at things in the > more traditional way are fundamentalists? >
Does the correctness or otherwise of any new paradigm have anything to do with those who reject it being fundamentalists? I would have thought their rejection of it was sufficient? I would have thought that paradigms are not actually correct, just kind of current. As a matter of interest, what are your two paradigms of the last 2500 years? Andrew _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
