On 4 Sep 2006, at 3:05AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:

On 4 Sep 2006 at 2:49, William T Goodall wrote:


On 4 Sep 2006, at 2:27AM, Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro wrote:

Andrew Crystall wrote:

A low-end Mac Pro will cost you $2,124 compared with $3,071 for a

In America. For one specific model. And with a very expensive Windows
PC make for comparison. And without similar options for warranty,
etc.

Here in Brazil it's even worse. A Mac costs about twice as much
as the equivalent PC-cum-Windoze.


But that's a short sighted view. The Mac is much cheaper in the long
term. I recently retired an old Mac still in working order, that was
nearly ten years old. Ten years of useful life!

Reliable technical sources available on the internet confirm that a
Windows PC connected to the internet is filled with backdoors,
trojans, key-loggers and other malware in ten minutes. Ten minutes of
useful life!

Thus even if a Mac cost $100,000 and a PC only $1 over the course of
ten years the Mac would work out cheaper! Still only $100,000 whereas
you'd need over $500,000 worth of PCs!

Comparisons Maru

Yes, if you're a blithering retard, as apparently you are. There are
no other words for it.

Let's see, on one hand you're comparing the length a machine can run
without breaking down, which is based largely on build quality.
Moreover, that mac largely is a sealed box, and you can't upgrade
parts, etc.

I upgraded the RAM and HD in a 1999 iMac last week. I've added RAM, hard drives, USB cards, 802.11 networking cards and whatnot to a wide variety of desktop and laptop Macs over the years. The original iMacs are a bit of a pain - took me 40 minutes start to finish the first time I opened one up - but most are < 5 minutes.


On the other hand, you're comparing the time a computer can be
connected to the internet, entire unprotected, before it picks up
nastyware. Which a variety of free firewalls and virus scanners
protect against.

But most people aren't non-technophiles like you and don't know how to protect themselves against malicious intrusions. And a computer that's part of a botnet launching DoS attacks and mailing millions of spams out through its unknowing owner's cable or DSL connection is very far from useful.

More useful Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/

"There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in
Tennessee -- that says, fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again." -George W. Bush, Nashville, Tenn., Sept. 17, 2002


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to