On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:20 PM, Charlie Bell wrote:
On 21/09/2006, at 1:13 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 9/20/06, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But it's often used wrongly, to state that the
probabilitical nature of "scientific proof" means we can't be
certain
of some things.
Hey, you have inspired a neologism.
Creationism is probapolitically true.
*snicker* Pleased to be of service...
Now we have *two* words to express the same idea: this one can join
"truthiness", which means roughly the same thing. It's true because
it /feels/ true to me.
Dave
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
