Ronn! wrote: > What if we spend the >>$10T (Dan's figure) to reduce the > anthropogenic component of global warming and then find out that it > was not the primary driving cause and we still have to deal with > the storms, floods, droughts, famines and hundreds of millions of > refugees? Or if China doesn't want to go along with what the rest > of the world does and uses its military to enforce its right to do > whatever it chooses to do? (I suppose "nuclear winter" might > indeed be a way to counteract "global warming" . . . ) Or, of > course, "all of the above" . . .
Then we'll have a cleaner, more efficient world that, having worked together and not been entirely successful at solving a problem, can use that problem solving experience to face a grave threat to their survival. And how is it that we expect China to participate if the so called leaders of the world don't? Doug _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
