On 25 Oct 2006 at 12:14, Nick Arnett wrote: > On 10/25/06, Andrew Crystall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > You mean except the sarin shells and suchlike? Yea. no, he didn't > > have nuclear capacity, but chemical and a willingness to use it? Ask > > the Kurds. > > > If he had chemical WMDs when we invaded, then the president of the United > States misled the entire country this morning. > > He was discouraged that Saddam didn't *still* have WMDs, apparently.
"WMD", right. A useless politicised term. I prefer the precise term "NBC". Which, indeed, he retained the capacity for. They're STILL finding stashes of decayed chemical warfare shells out there. AndrewC Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
