Charlie Bell wrote: >Jim Sharkey wrote: >>Further, I would note that you and everyone else here has, in any >>number of discussions in the past, chosen to ignore some questions >>or comments on any topic. This may be tacitly ceding a given point, >>or (as in my case this time) not really understanding the question, >> but there may be other reasons of which I'm not really cognizant. > >Lack of interest in pursuing that line, unwillingness to split the >thread, >lack of time to answer all details of a thread, meaning to >reply to it later >but the discussion moves on, or just forgetfulness.
See? Had I taken a little time to think, I might have come up with those reasons. Maybe we should number them all and then when a set of questions comes up, just reply with a number indicating why a more thoughtful response is not forthcoming. :-) >I never take it as a snub. *Snubs Charlie, then spreads a nasty rumor about him, just like in a bad nighttime soap opera* Jim _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
