David Hobby wrote: > > A lot of people don't like imaginary numbers, so that would > be popular. I don't think it says in the Bible that sqrt(2) > is rational, so they'd probably let it stay irrational. : ) > I guess the only vaguely math related topic in the Bible is the approximation pi ~ 3.
>> Conservapedia is quite poor in Math articles. > > Hence the question: How blatantly can they steal content > they want from other sources, just slapping it on their > site? It seems their best chance of getting comprehensive > coverage. > If you consider that Wikipedia's math content was stolen from Eric W. Weisstein's MathWorld, who, in his turn, also stole from voluntary contributions, then I think it's fine. Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
