Doug wrote: > Has he been arrogant at times? Maybe, but that sort of thing is difficult > to judge via email. One can often sound arrogant or diffident or whiny and > not really mean to. But if arrogance was the criteria by which we judged > people for their on list fitness, how long would JDG have lasted?
ROFLMAO!! Exactly. And how many times did how many of us try to talk to him about the *way* he said things more that *what* he said. >And as > much as I disagreed vehemently with that other John, I miss not having him > here to spar with. I, too, agree that both Johns have/had a right to his opinions and in no way should be threatened, moderated or have hands slapped. I can choose to disengage, also, and let you guys do what you do so well and dazzle me with websites and mathematical analyses. > Please, lets get back to the health care debate and quit with the personal > stuff. I disagree, Doug. Talking about how we have worked out talking to each other, especially after 'the big blow' and a few of the smaller ones is an important steam release valve, I think, and one of the ways this list continues to work. How are the second smartest grandkids in the world doing =+))? Amities, Jo Anne evens...@hevanet.com _______________________________________________ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
