Hello everyone, The suggestion that I can see least arguments against is splitting tour 1 regionally, presumably north/south. the benefits to this as I see them are:
1. The open format of tour 1 means it can be split 50:50 without worrying about how to decide on a seeding system; 2. Top 16 teams - hence "commited/organised" players would be playing in both, so someone would be able to run the thing; 3. Tour 1 is always the most heavily subscribed, so is in most need of splitting. the only potential problem is getting an even split in terms of both number and quality of teams so that they can be effectively seeded for subsequent tours. which could possibly be solved by making Clapham 1 play up north. _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
