I guess we'll have to do this the old fashioned way. Please fill in the
blanks - and no cheating!


Spirit?
1   Clapham 1
2   LLL1
3   Chevy S
4   Chevy N
5   Druids
6   Tshark
7   Plastic Factory 1
8   Clapham 2
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29  Plastic Factory2
30
How many teams were there anyway?

Jack



> Won't we need the results to determine who gets entry to Tour 3? The two
> trekkers being 'back just in time' may well be too late for the TD of
> Tour 3 who has to work out who gets automatic entry...
> 
> Surely publishing the results on BD within one or two days should be one
> of the standards written into whatever docs are being created about
> running Tours? Along with the potential to fine TDs after events which
> fail to meet certain standards.
> 
> Would it help if we all mailed our Tour 2 results to the TD of Tour 3,
> the DoC, or worked them out on BD?
> 
>> If it helps at all I don't think Clapham choked this time ;-) Fatboy
> Fatboy is correct, the lozenges worked a treat and Clapham 1 won Tour 2
> with a clear throat, beating LLL 17-15 in a great final. Clapham South,
> sorry Chevvy South, beat Chevvy North in the 3/4. Druids obviously kept
> turnover-machine Bachelor under control and beat Sharks in the 5/6. BPF
> beat Clapham 2 in the 7/8.
> 
> C some of you this w/e,
> rt
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 June 2003 09:56
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [BD] Tour 2 Lost Property
> 
> 
> To all those who lost stuff at Tour 2....
> 
> There is a big pile of stuff that Bisto has left festering in my front
> room that I can only assume is the Lost Property from the tournament. As
> I am not currently living there, I don't have a problem with the
> numerous nasty smells that are undoubtedly emanating from it, but I will
> not be going through it, it's for him to sort out when he returns!
> 
> As the 2 trekkers are back just in time for Tour 3, I suspect that the
> plan is to take it all there - although I couldn't be sure of that.
> 
> Cheers
> Ruth
> Red #11
> 
> __________________________________________________
> BritDisc mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://pootle.near.me.uk/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
> Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp
> 
> __________________________________________________
> BritDisc mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://pootle.near.me.uk/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
> Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp
> 

__________________________________________________
BritDisc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pootle.near.me.uk/mailman/listinfo/britdisc
Staying informed - http://www.ukultimate.com/informed.asp

Reply via email to