Dear Sean,
thank you for this detailed reply. I skipped it somehow.
These days I hope I'll have some time to look at the options and come back.
In the last part of my master's thesis, as much as time allows, I should
modify BRL-CAD to add some features needed by the sponsor, mostly public
code.
Best wishes,
:) Alex
Christopher Sean Morrison wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> There are a few options that come to mind:
>
> a) If it's not performance intensive metadata, you can associate
> arbitrary data to any object as an attribute or set of attributes.
> Attributes are key=value string data. You could utilize that to
> store per-vertex metadata using either keys that tie to vertices or a
> single key that ties to a value set for all your vertices.
>
> b) You could maintain a parallel storage of arbitrary binary data
> using binary objects. I'd probably set an attribute (e.g.,
> color_values="my_table") on your NMG object that refers to a binary
> object. The binary object ("my_table" in this example) would then
> contain whatever data you want.
>
> c) We could extend any one of the NMG structures (e.g. struct vertex)
> to have a user data pointer. Simple enough, though if this route is
> selected, it'll probably be worthwhile to add a user data pointer to
> *all* of the core NMG structures (vertex, edge, loop, face, shell,
> nmgregion, and model) or their respective use structures for
> consistency.
>
> d) You can utilize the nmg_visit_handlers interface to maintain an
> arbitrary data structure with your data when it actually comes time
> to process the data. This is probably the most effective for in-
> memory processing, but of course is not that effective as a means of
> serialization (though coupled with (b) it could be).
>
> If (c) is most appealing, we can discuss in further detail on the
> brlcad-devel list to make sure any change we make fits your needs.
> There are possibly a few other options as well, but that's just what
> immediately came to mind.
>
> Cheers!
> Sean
>
>
>
> On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Nu Eu wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>> I would like to be able to store custom data for some vertices from
>> BRL-CAD object and don't see any means to do it after reading the
>> introduction.
>>
>> The next thing I thought of is adding some structure to the base
>> vertex type. But point_t is a vector of floats, so it would be quite
>> complicated.
>>
>> What else could I use to store custom data?
>>
>> Thank you for attention,
>> Alex
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
>> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
>> royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally
>> facing
>> server and web deployment.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
>> _______________________________________________
>> BRL-CAD Users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-users
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
> Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
> royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
> server and web deployment.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
> _______________________________________________
> BRL-CAD Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com
_______________________________________________
BRL-CAD Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-users
