Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 03.11.2008 at 14:58:55 Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] >>> even with usb displays? >> >> libusb-win32 poses some problem, but yes it should work. >> > What's the reason for libusb-win32? In Linux, brltty recognizes the USB > plugged displays without any problems, so why not in Windows?
BRLTTY has a native USB implementation on Linux (and some BSDs). For all platforms where there is no internal (native) implementation for USB access we use libusb. In theory, one could wirte a native USB implementation for BRLTTY on Windows based on the code that libusb already implements to get rid of the external dependency. In reality, its questionable if such an effort will increase the quality and stability of the USB backend on Windows in the long run. Its probably better to bundle libusb-win32 with the win32 brltty distribution (and installer) if we really have too many versioning/compatibility problems. -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> .''`. | Get my public key via finger mlang/[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :' : | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44 `. `' `- <URL:http://delysid.org/> <URL:http://www.staff.tugraz.at/mlang/> _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
