I personally don't see the need for a separate brltty repository unless it intends to provide something the debian repositories doesn't (eg. backported versions of the current release, SVN snapshots, etc).
Michael Whapples On 10/11/09 16:47, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Samuel Thibault on 2009/11/10 at 16:58 +0100] > > >> http://packages.debian.org/brltty >> http://packages.ubuntu.com/brltty >> >> We can also ask backports.org to build newer versions of brltty for >> older versions of Debian. >> > There are a lot of packages. Perhaps the best solution is to just put links on > brltty's download page to these sites, or do you think copying the files would > be better? > > There was also Aldo's idea. Is there a way for us to have a brltty-only repo > (or whatever Debian calls it) so that a user could point to something on > brltty's web site which would respond as a Debian package site would but just > for brltty, preferably causing the upgrading user to download the actual > brltty > packages from Debian's site? > > _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
