On May 24, 2013, at 5:04 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Today I am looking at the SMB Analyzer, and I have few questions. > -Why did you choose to anlayse the SNIA-CIFS version, and not the others > ? (http://www.cifs.org/wiki/SMB/CIFS_References). Some of them have new > dialects and don't match anymore :s . (I know, the SMB documentation is > a real mess.. ).
Why do you say that we are implementing the SNIA-CIFS version? > -Some events are not well written into the event.bif : > For instance, the smb_com_negotiate event is build with 3 arguments What's in the release is not where the current development is. The current version of the development is in the topic/seth/smb-smb2-work branch. .Seth -- Seth Hall International Computer Science Institute (Bro) because everyone has a network http://www.bro.org/ _______________________________________________ bro-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/bro-dev
